New Zealand’s unemployment rate climbed to 5.6 percent in the June quarter, the highest reading in more than a decade and a worse result than any bank economist or the Reserve Bank had picked.
Figures released by Stats NZ on Wednesday put the number of people out of work and actively looking for it at 171,000, up from 164,000 three months earlier. The March quarter rate was also revised upwards, from 5.3 percent to 5.4 percent, which means the labour market was already softer than the official record had shown at the time.
“The unemployment rate was 5.6 percent in the June 2026 quarter, compared with 5.4 percent in the March 2026 quarter,” Stats NZ spokesperson Abby Johnston said.
Every forecaster missed it. BNZ, Westpac and the Reserve Bank had all settled on 5.4 percent, while ANZ and ASB were the most pessimistic of the main forecasters at 5.5 percent. The last time unemployment sat this high was late 2015.
For anyone running a business, the number that says more about the state of the labour market is underutilisation. That is the broadest measure Stats NZ publishes of people who want more paid work than they are currently getting, and it jumped to 13.8 percent from 12.9 percent. In headcount terms that is 440,000 people. It splits into 171,000 who are unemployed, 154,000 who have a job but want more hours, and 115,000 who want work and are available to start but were not actively hunting during the survey week.
The size of that last group is a reminder that the headline rate flatters the picture. People who stop looking drop out of the unemployment count altogether, and when conditions improve they reappear and push the rate up again.
Something like that is already happening. The participation rate rose to 70.7 percent from 70.4 percent, meaning more New Zealanders put their hand up for work over the quarter. The employment rate held at 66.7 percent with 2,905,000 people in work. Firms did add jobs. They simply did not add them fast enough to absorb everyone who came looking.
Where you live makes an enormous difference to how any of this feels. North Island unemployment hit 6.0 percent, up from 5.3 percent a year earlier. The South Island sat at 3.7 percent. That is a gap of more than two percentage points between the two halves of the country, and it is wide enough that employers in Canterbury, Otago and Southland are still competing for staff while employers in much of the North Island are fielding stacks of applications for every vacancy.
Age is the other great divider. Underutilisation among 15 to 24 year olds rose from 33.6 percent to 37.0 percent over the year, an increase of 21,500 young people. More than one in three young New Zealanders in the labour force now wants work, or wants more work, than they have. The share of that age group not in employment, education or training reached 13.8 percent. ASB senior economist Mark Smith pointed out that the very youngest cohort, 15 to 19 year olds, is carrying an unemployment rate of around 25 percent.
Disabled New Zealanders of working age fared worse again, with an unemployment rate of 12.8 percent against 5.7 percent for people without a disability, and underutilisation of 30.0 percent against 13.6 percent.
The pay side of the release is where the squeeze on households shows up. The labour cost index, which tracks what the same job pays from quarter to quarter and holds the quality of the work constant, rose 2.0 percent over the year. Private sector pay was up 2.0 percent and public sector pay 1.7 percent. Average ordinary time hourly earnings reached $44.62, up 2.8 percent, and average weekly earnings for a full-time equivalent employee reached $1,730, up 3.0 percent.
Set any of those against annual inflation of 4.1 percent and the arithmetic is blunt. Pay packets are growing more slowly than the cost of what they buy, so the average worker is going backwards in what their wage actually covers. Renters and lower income households feel that first, because a larger share of their income goes on the things that have risen fastest.
What has driven inflation to 4.1 percent is not domestic wage pressure. It is fuel. Petrol was up 27.5 percent over the year and diesel up 71 percent, together accounting for a large slice of the total. That is an imported cost shock, and it is why the Reserve Bank found itself lifting the official cash rate by 25 basis points to 2.50 percent on 8 July, its first increase since May 2023, at the exact moment demand for labour at home was weakening.
Westpac senior economist Michael Gordon said the data cut both ways. “The unemployment rate rose by more than expected, and although the employment measures were mixed, on average they support our expectation of soft growth in activity over the quarter,” he said. Gordon noted that employers are pointing to the cost of living rather than difficulty finding staff as the reason they are lifting pay, which suggests the wage pressure in the system is not being driven by a shortage of workers.
That distinction matters for what happens next. If wage growth is a response to petrol prices rather than a scramble for scarce staff, the case for holding rates high to cool the labour market gets harder to make when the labour market is already cooling on its own. The Reserve Bank’s next call is a full monetary policy statement on 2 September, and the June quarter numbers land squarely in the middle of that decision.
For businesses the immediate read is mixed. Wage bills are contained, staff are easier to find in most of the North Island, and the pressure to match competitors on pay has eased. But the same numbers describe 440,000 customers with less money and less certainty, at a time when borrowing costs are going up rather than down.
Are you hiring, or looking for work? Tell us what you are seeing in your part of the country in the comments below.
This article was written by AI, briefed to report the facts, hopefully without some of the bias people bring to the job 🙂
Leave a Reply