Advertisement

Less than half of New Zealand five-year-olds pass new phonics test in first full year of results

Less than half of New Zealand five-year-olds passed the country’s new phonics test after a full year of schooling, according to data released by the Education Ministry on Monday.

Results from the 40-week phonics check, sat in term four last year, show 47 percent of the 4,209 children assessed were at or above curriculum expectations for letter sound knowledge and early decoding. In schools facing the highest level of socio-economic barriers, only 25 percent of children reached the same benchmark.

Advertisement
Lead Source Pro ad. Google says it was Google, Meta says it was Meta. Lead Source Pro shows where each WordPress lead really came from.

The check asked children to read up to 40 words, including real words and made-up words designed to test decoding rather than memory. Pupils needed to read 24 correctly to be judged at or above expectations. The same test is also given after 20 weeks of schooling, where nine correct answers is considered sufficient.

According to RNZ’s reporting on the figures, 27 percent of children who sat the term four check were flagged as needing extra support. The Ministry’s report covered 20,096 results from 16,896 students, around 28 percent of last year’s Year 1 cohort, after the test was made available to schools on an optional basis before becoming mandatory across all primary schools this year.

The Ministry described the figures as the clearest picture yet of how five-year-olds are progressing in early reading. It said the results showed why students who fall behind needed to be identified as early as possible so they could be helped before gaps widened in later years. Phonics ability in the first year of school is a strong predictor of reading proficiency further up the school, the report noted.

Advertisement

Canterbury University education professor Gail Gillon, who founded the Better Start Literacy Approach used widely in New Zealand classrooms, told RNZ the results showed real progress on previous years but still left too many children needing extra help.

“The percentage of children from this data showing that they still need more support is still high. It’s certainly better than it’s been in the past if we look back to national standards data,” she said.

Advertisement

Gillon said the gap could be narrowed with focused teaching in the first year of school, and she expected results to lift further as teachers became more familiar with the new structured literacy programme that has been rolled out nationally.

She also warned against treating phonics as the only marker of reading progress. “We’ve got to be careful that we’re also monitoring their oral language development and listening comprehension skills that really underpin reading comprehension, as well as of course their spelling skills,” she said.

The new figures show the cohort of children who sat the 40-week check in term four had higher pass rates than those who sat the same test earlier in the year. Pass rates were 35 percent for the term three cohort, 29 percent in term two, and 26 percent in term one, giving an average of 39 percent across the four cohorts of children who sat the 40-week check at different points in 2025.

The lower term one rate reflects that those children were tested earlier in their five-year-old year, before completing a full programme of phonics instruction. The Ministry says the trend across terms is consistent with steady gains in skill over time, rather than an underlying drop in achievement.

The phonics check is one of several changes introduced by Education Minister Erica Stanford as part of the structured literacy approach. From next year, children will start being tested after 20 weeks of schooling rather than waiting until the end of the year, with the aim of catching difficulties earlier. Stanford has said phonics testing is one small part of a broader picture, but supporters argue early data lets schools target reading support before children fall too far behind.

Critics have raised concerns that labelling young children as below expectations can become self-fulfilling, with some education academics arguing that test pressure on five-year-olds risks knocking confidence at the very start of school. The Ministry’s report does not name individual children or schools, and the pass mark is described as a guide for teacher follow up rather than a graded result for pupils.

The 25 percent pass rate in the lowest decile schools is the figure that will draw the most attention. It points to a clear link between household income and early reading progress, with children in lower-income areas starting school with smaller vocabularies on average and less access to books and structured language at home. Targeted reading interventions in the first year of school have shown strong gains in trials of the Better Start Literacy Approach, but extending that support across every Year 1 classroom is a much bigger logistical task for the Ministry and individual boards of trustees.

The wider question is whether the new phonics regime will deliver on the Government’s reading targets. The Coalition has committed to lifting the share of Year 8 students reading at the expected level to 80 percent by 2030. The starting point in 2024 sat well below that, and progress has been slow. Reading specialists say structured literacy in the first three years of school is the lever most likely to move the dial, provided schools get the staffing, training and resources to make it work.

What do you think of the new phonics check and the early results from Year 1? Are children in your community getting the support they need to read confidently? Let us know in the comments below.

This article was written by AI, briefed to report the facts, hopefully without some of the bias people bring to the job 🙂

Comments

One response to “Less than half of New Zealand five-year-olds pass new phonics test in first full year of results”

  1. Gaynor Chapman

    My mother Doris Ferry was the NZ phonic expert late last century and taught 1500 reading failing children , in the high decile Kapiti Coast She taught intensive phonics which was systematic , explicit and sequential, synthetic and phonograms . She employed no Whole Language techniques nor readers at all . Her methods were those of earlier NZ . pre 1950s , but she adopted modern phonics workbooks by American Prof. Emerald Dechant and Prof. Heilman who also wrote a text “Phonics in Proper ‘ , Ginn 100 texts and workbooks which had no Whole Language , techniques. Her method more aligns with that of current distinguished , emeritus Prof. Timothy Shanahan of USA , who challenges the overuse of decadable texts, and believes learning of a number of high frequency words does no damage since we have , he believes two pathways visual and phonic. By learning of about 100 high frequency words along with phonemes children are able to read early, more natural , but controlled vocabulary readers . He does advocates using predictable texts, sparingly and declares they are not part of the Science of Reading. My mother’s method , remembering she was dealing with the bottom 25% , was very successful with that group . Her whole set up relied on having parents or other non-pecialist teaching their own children , daily . Jolly phonics , publisher Chris Jolly pleaded with Doris to endorse his programme , which she refused since it failed to accommodate the struggling reader in a many aspects . NZ has mostly based their current programme on Jolly phonics . I am not at all surprised it does not address the issues of the less prepared and less able student since Doris could see that , when compared with her programme . With her programme no child proceeds onto the next phoneme unless they are well established in what they have covered already. For example the long vowels were not taught until the short vowels , all the consonants , the digraphs , and all consonant blends , including Anglo Saxon ones were known thoroughly and the child could spell as well as read them all. This meant all other vowels were usually not covered until the second year . This thoroughness coincides with most traditional synthetic phonics programmes , including that in NZ,pre 1950. The current programmes are too fast , lacking enough sight words, for the child, to be able to read more natural text and include destructive whole language predictable texts which are much more damaging than learning more high frequency words . The Science of Reading is dogmatic and relies on ‘research’ rather than acknowledging what highly experienced teachers like Shanahan
    have found in practice with respect to fluency and flexibility in reading English text . Jolly phonics , invented in the 1985 , was derived from a German system . German is a very transparent language unlike opaque English and this fact should be incorporated into decision making for programmes . I suspect it is Progressive Ideology , which dictates official decisions , not the real needs of all children particularly the less able or socially disadvantaged . Jolly Phonics or similar programmes, a modern invention has to automatically it would seem better, than anything traditional .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *