Advertisement

Auckland’s tourism agency lands $975,490 to sell the rest of New Zealand to North America

Auckland’s council owned tourism agency has been handed the largest single marketing brief in a new government funding round, and almost none of the money is meant to keep visitors in Auckland.

Tourism and Hospitality Minister Louise Upston announced on 7 September that the government is putting $5 million into six international marketing campaigns through the third round of the Regional Tourism Boost fund. Tātaki Auckland Unlimited leads one of them, a $975,490 campaign aimed at travellers from the United States and Canada, and the brief is explicitly about moving them around the country rather than parking them in the city they fly into.

Advertisement
Lead Source Pro ad. Google says it was Google, Meta says it was Meta. Lead Source Pro shows where each WordPress lead really came from.

“We want more visitors arriving in the quieter months and travelling beyond our main gateways to experience the regions that make New Zealand unique,” Upston said in the announcement published by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.

Auckland is the main gateway. Most international visitors to New Zealand arrive through Auckland Airport, so a campaign designed to push North Americans past it is, on the face of it, an odd thing for Auckland’s own destination agency to be running. The reason it makes sense to the sector is in the partner list. According to MBIE’s breakdown of the round, the North America campaign brings together 30 regional tourism organisations, from Northland Inc to Great South and Clutha Development, which is twice the number in any of the other five campaigns. Auckland is the only agency with the scale and the offshore trade relationships to hold a group that size together.

The campaign will work through airline, trade and travel distribution partners, using airfare promotions, bookable experiences and regional content. It runs through spring 2026 and into early summer 2027, ahead of the peak season, which is the part that matters most to Auckland accommodation.

Advertisement

Auckland’s hotel year is lopsided. Figures from MBIE’s Accommodation Data Programme show the region ran at 83.6 per cent occupancy in February this year and 63.6 per cent in September last year, a gap of twenty percentage points between the peak and the shoulder. International visitors made up 45.8 per cent of Auckland guest nights in January and 34.4 per cent in July. Filling September and October is worth more to an Auckland hotel than adding another night in February, because February is close to full already.

The North American market is also the one that has stalled while others have run. Stats NZ figures released on 14 August put total visitor arrivals at 3.67 million in the June 2026 year, up 9 per cent on the year before, with international travel statistics spokesperson Dave O’Donovan saying “visitors from Australia and China made up over two-thirds of the increase”. The United States remains the second largest source market at 385,500 arrivals for the year, but it is not what has been driving the recovery. Two of the six campaigns in this round, worth almost $2 million between them, target China. North America gets one.

Advertisement

The rest of the round splits along familiar lines. RotoruaNZ leads a $994,902 North Island food and hospitality campaign into mainland China, and ChristchurchNZ leads a $994,902 South Island campaign aimed at Chinese travellers, including Chinese passport holders living in Australia. Destination Great Lake Taupō and RotoruaNZ share $794,902 to build up to eight regional food trails for Australian and American visitors. Visit Hurunui takes $644,902 for an Australian campaign covering the top of the South Island, and WellingtonNZ takes $594,902 to sell the Classic New Zealand Wine and Food Trail to Australians. The six grants add up to exactly $5 million.

“Tourism and hospitality supports jobs, businesses and local economies, and this $5 million investment will help ensure more regions share in that success,” Upston said. It is the third round of the fund, following rounds that ran from April to June 2025 and from January to June 2026.

Auckland goes into the campaign in better shape than it has been for years. Guest nights across the region reached 651,500 in July, up from 551,300 in July 2025, an increase of 18.2 per cent calculated from the MBIE figures and well ahead of the national rise of 11.6 per cent. Occupancy lifted to 62.4 per cent from 55.8 per cent. Hotels took 453,700 of those guest nights and ran at 67.6 per cent occupancy, and the region was carrying 21,291 stay units, about 700 more than a year earlier as new rooms came on.

Most of that July growth was domestic. Domestic guest nights rose to 427,200 from 358,500, while international guest nights went from 192,800 to 224,300. Auckland hotels have spent the winter being filled by New Zealanders, which is a decent result and a thin foundation.

That is the context for a funding round that arrives in the middle of an argument about who pays for tourism marketing. Tātaki Auckland Unlimited was openly critical when National ruled out the accommodation levy that Auckland’s hotel sector had asked for, on the grounds that the city needed a way to fund event attraction and destination marketing. National has since said it would redirect international visitor levy revenue to councils instead, with Auckland estimated to receive $19.1 million in the first year. Against those numbers, $975,490 for a campaign that sends visitors to Kaikōura and Clutha is small change, and it is the money that is actually on the table now.

For Auckland’s hotels the calculation is simpler than the politics. A North American visitor who commits to a three week loop of both islands still starts and finishes at Auckland Airport, and still needs a bed at each end. The dispersal the government wants and the room nights Auckland wants are not in conflict, so long as the campaign works.

This article was contributed by Auckland Hotels, a comprehensive guide to accommodation in Auckland, New Zealand.

Should Auckland’s agency be spending public money sending visitors out of Auckland, or should the city market itself first? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

This article was written by AI, briefed to report the facts, hopefully without some of the bias people bring to the job 🙂

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *