New Zealand’s councils have eight days left to tell the government who they want to merge with, and in region after region the answer is turning out to be almost anyone except the nearest big city.
The deadline is Sunday 9 August. It comes from an ultimatum delivered on 5 May by Local Government Minister Simon Watts and RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop, who gave every council outside Auckland three months to produce its own reorganisation plan under a scheme called Head Start. Councils that put up a credible proposal get a say in what replaces them. Councils that do not will be reorganised anyway, under a backstop process the government has yet to spell out.
Bishop was blunt about it at the time. Councils should “lead your own reform, or we will do it for you. Either way, change is coming,” he said. Watts said proposals should focus on creating “larger, more efficient unitary authorities that streamline functions, reduce duplication, and improve decision-making”. He added that proposals did not need to cover a whole region, “but they must show clear support, strong leadership, and real benefits for communities”.
What has emerged in the three months since is not quite what the pitch implied. The country currently has 78 councils, made up of 61 city and district councils, 11 regional councils and six unitary authorities that already do both jobs. The reform is meant to produce fewer and larger organisations. Instead, in several regions, the proposals now on the table would merge the smaller rural districts with each other and leave the largest urban council standing on its own.
Otago is the sharpest example, and it moved again this week. Central Otago District and Clutha District councils have both voted to pursue a merger with Queenstown Lakes District Council. Clutha mayor Jock Martin has put forward three versions of the model, and, as RNZ reported on Saturday, all three leave urban Dunedin out. One of them would take the rural fringes of Dunedin, Strath Taieri, the Taieri Plains and Waihemo, into the new authority while the city itself stays separate.
Dunedin city councillor Andrew Simms called that idea ridiculous and said the whole region should be in one authority. “In my view it’s just naked self interest and doesn’t address the opportunities there are for all of us by actually building a bigger unitary authority for all of Otago,” he told RNZ. Martin rejected that. “There’s definitely no self interest, I was elected by our district to lead for our people and they are front of mind,” he said. He told RNZ his boundaries were drawn around river catchments, because what happens at the head of the Clutha affects ratepayers at the bottom of it, and pointed to a Clutha survey in which 57 percent of respondents said they wanted to stay rural.
Dunedin mayor Sophie Barker is not pushing to be included either. She said a single Otago council would leave the city with double the ratepayers and ten times the land area to look after. “I don’t believe mass centralisation will deliver significant benefits for our residents,” she said. Queenstown Lakes councillors were due to consider the proposal on Monday.
The same pattern shows up elsewhere. A 1News survey of the country published on 27 July found South Taranaki and Stratford voting almost unanimously for a joint unitary authority that excludes New Plymouth, the region’s biggest council. In Canterbury, Christchurch mayor Phil Mauger says the city needs to submit a proposal, but neighbouring councils have made their reluctance to pair up with it clear, and Waimakariri reported that 90 percent of its survey respondents preferred a North Canterbury council or going it alone over joining Christchurch. In Northland, Kaipara voted unanimously against the staged merger its three neighbours support. In Wellington, Upper Hutt looks unlikely to back the proposed metro authority with Wellington, Lower Hutt and Porirua.
Some councils are opting out of the process altogether. ManawatΕ« District Council decided unanimously not to submit a proposal, with mayor Michael Ford describing the exercise as a giant dating game in which his district risked being sold off like a bride without its consent. Whanganui mayor Andrew Tripe has said his district will not be ready by 9 August, after a council survey found 58 percent of respondents opposed to amalgamation. Wairoa has formally resolved not to join any wider Hawke’s Bay plan, and Tasman is holding out against a merger with Nelson that Nelson mayor Nick Smith is actively campaigning for.
Whether any of that resistance counts for much is the open question. The government has been clear that not submitting is not the same as not changing. Watts said in May that areas which failed to come forward would face a backstop involving a standardised approach and transitional governance arrangements. Bishop put the timetable in plainer terms still, saying regional councillors will not be elected at the 2028 local body elections.
Proposals go to the Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport, which will assess them against criteria including practicality, value for money, effective representation and how well they fit the new resource management system. Cabinet decisions on which outlines get through are expected later this year, with detailed proposals in 2027 and legislation after that, all aimed at having new councils in place before the 2028 local elections.
That timetable runs straight through the 7 November general election, which means voters get a say on the government driving the reform before the councils it reshapes are finalised. If you want to work out where the parties stand before you vote, our voting tool matches your views on policy against theirs.
Do you want your council merged with its neighbours, or left alone? Tell us in the comments below.
This article was written by AI, briefed to report the facts, hopefully without some of the bias people bring to the job π
Leave a Reply