The Security Intelligence Service says it disrupted an attempt by a Chinese organisation with close links to that country’s government to install satellite tracking equipment in New Zealand, one of several real cases described in the spy agency’s annual threat assessment released on Thursday.
The New Zealand’s Security Threat Environment 2026 report names the Purple Mountain Observatory, which it describes as an organisation based in the People’s Republic of China with close links to its government, as having attempted in the past year to install ground based space infrastructure here. The equipment tracks satellites and space debris and gathers scientific data, but the report says it is also attractive to foreign states wanting to advance military capabilities and intelligence operations.
According to the report, the observatory worked with a local company “that was likely unaware of the equipment’s capability to collect intelligence of military value and would have no idea who was receiving the data”. The agency says it assesses the data would have been willingly passed to the Chinese government, and that this was not the first attempt by that organisation to install its own infrastructure in New Zealand and is unlikely to be the last.
New Zealand is an unusually useful place to watch the sky. The report says this country and Pacific Island nations are well placed to track satellites passing over the Asia-Pacific in a range of orbits, with little radio interference or visual obstruction, and that New Zealand can be the first or last chance to communicate with satellites crossing regions where tracking coverage is thin. That is a commercial advantage for a growing local space industry. It is also, the assessment argues, a reason foreign states want a foothold here without saying so.
Legitimate operators have been led to believe they were entering a commercial or research partnership with a foreign entity when the company’s links back to a foreign state had been deliberately obscured, the report says. Ground based space infrastructure is now regulated under the Outer Space and High Altitude Activities Act, and operators must obtain authorisation and report annually that their protective security and due diligence arrangements are current.
This is the fourth edition of the report, which the agency stresses is its own independent assessment and not government policy. It makes six key judgements. Geopolitical upheaval is bringing downstream threats to New Zealand. Public and private organisations are being targeted by foreign states and their proxies for intellectual property, technology and other non-public information. Diaspora community groups here are being unfairly targeted by foreign states seeking to limit the rights and freedoms they have as New Zealanders. More insiders are causing harm to their employers and to national security. The terrorism threat level remains at possible, and violent extremism here is being shaped by a broad range of ideologies, domestic and international events, and the mainstreaming of extremist rhetoric online.
On espionage, the report is blunt about who is doing the most of it. Several states spy on New Zealand, it says, but the People’s Republic of China is the only country the agency has detected doing so at scale. It adds a qualifier, saying that should not stop New Zealand organisations doing business with entities in that country, and that firms should instead take an eyes wide open approach in every market they operate in.
Much of the activity described is unglamorous. The agency says it has seen increased targeting of professional networking sites and online job platforms by China’s military intelligence services, aimed at current and former government officials who have held classified or sensitive information. Intelligence officers or their affiliates pose as consultants, think tank staff or recruiters, advertise for analysts in foreign policy, defence or security, then vet applicants to work out what they know and whether they will share it. Candidates are sometimes paid to write research papers to gauge the depth of their knowledge before being pressed for privileged material.
One case study describes a New Zealander who advertised their security clearance on a social media profile. A foreign state actor noticed, used a cover company to offer a lucrative contract, and the person carried on with the recruitment process even though they suspected the employer was not genuine. Another describes a Russian state-owned organisation trying to buy specialised components through the offshore subsidiary of a New Zealand registered company, with the link to the Russian government concealed because sanctions and export controls left no legitimate route to the technology.
Director-General of Security Andrew Hampton said the malign behaviour seen over the last year is proving even more threatening for a country of New Zealand’s size and location. “Countries are being buffeted by shifting geopolitical forces, unprecedented levels of polarisation in societies, ongoing economic pressures and rapid advances in artificial intelligence. The flow-on effects for New Zealand’s national security makes up a complex and volatile picture,” he said in a statement accompanying the report.
“We are highly interconnected with the rest of the world, we produce leading innovations, hold important security partnerships and are located in the strategically important Pacific region, close to Antarctica. This makes New Zealand not only geopolitically relevant, but attractive to threat actors who are unsentimental in their pursuit of our information and their influence over us.”
Not all of it comes from offshore. “Global events are not the sole source of New Zealand’s security challenges β some of our concerns are home grown,” Hampton said. “Extremist voices from within our shores are contributing to a polarised information environment, and we see some advocating for the use of violence. Young and vulnerable people are particularly susceptible to readily available online violent extremist narratives, which are often exacerbated by the use of artificial intelligence.”
The terrorism threat level has been at possible since an annual review announced in February. The report says the most likely scenario would be a lone person attacking people in a crowded place with weapons that are easy to get hold of, and that they would probably move to violence with little or no intelligence warning beforehand.
Hampton said the point of publishing is not to frighten anyone. “As I’ve said previously, we’re not trying be alarmist or cause fear. It’s about being as open as NZSIS can on what we see so that sectors, communities and individuals have the information they need to keep themselves and New Zealand safe,” he said, adding that national security “must be a collective effort” rather than something owned by the intelligence agencies alone. The release was also covered by 1News. The companion cyber threat report from the Government Communications Security Bureau’s National Cyber Security Centre is due in October.
Does an intelligence agency naming names in public make you feel better informed or more uneasy? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
This article was written by AI, briefed to report the facts, hopefully without some of the bias people bring to the job π
Leave a Reply